|
It's been as difficult as ever to
find a winner for the Dumb America Award. The standard
of ignorance and stupidity remains consistently
high as ever, and makes it a real challenge to single
out any one person. After much deliberation, however,
an overall winner has been selected, but before
we reveal the lucky contestant, some runners-up
deserve a special mention.
It seem the belief is as strong as
ever, amongst Americans, that English is an American
language sloppily adopted by other nations - most
notably the British, as 'Bobby' triumphantly crows:
|
"Civilisations",
my intellectually challenged friend, is most
definitely not a word. The only people who
I have EVER seen use the world "civilisations"
have been the British
|
Poor Bobby would probably be surprised
to find that we British have been almost fluent
in the English language since long before Americans
invented the word 'democracy'. (It must always come
as a surprise to American tourists to discover that
the Greeks have based their alphabet on the US fraternity
houses.)
However, Bobby cannot come close to
the standard required for Dumb America - since he
actually realises that the British do speak
English. The same possibly cannot be said for the
huge number of Americans who assume that I must
be American. Here is a tiny selection from hundreds
of e-mails saying much the same thing.
|
you are anti-American
and need to get the hell out!
-Mike
Hancock
And you, in your
obvious superiority are emigrating ASAP. I
hope
- John
Connolly
I'll bet your mother is "SO" proud
of you. I'm glad you are not my child. It's
to bad that my 2 sons are over in Iraq fighting
for heartless Americans like you
- Marvin Matherly
Keep your crap to yourself and stop spreading
this crap. Paid for by the democrats I'm sure.
You don't deserve to be read - so I stopped
reading.
- Julie B. Howard
|
It seems that, for most Americans,
the very notion that anyone speaking English might
not actually be American simply never enters into
that part of the brain which, in higher life-forms,
is referred to as the mind. No doubt they assume
that The
Office was dubbed for release in the states.
- On the subject of The Office, note
the paragraph in the link which says
|
a number of corporations have also bought
the series on DVD to show staff how an office
should not be run
|
It's going to be a revelation when
all those Americans discover that head-butting your
staff is off the agenda. I wonder if they will be
ordering copies of Fawlty Towers for the next convention
of the American Hoteliers Association . However,
I digress..
It is noticeable that Americans seem
most confident when they are wrong. As was Pam Thompson
when she wrote this concise rebuttal of our answer
to the question "Which of these is not a mammal?"
|
the question re
mammals - all the answers - shark, whale,
dolphin - are
mammals
|
One feels sorry for Pam in so many
ways, but particularly because she had actually
taken the time to do some research before braving
the perils of mental activity. But in true American
fashion, when informed of her error, she tried to
shift the blame onto someone else
|
And I did check
out the info on sharks - on the internet -
got some
bad info - go figure (overseas' site).
|
So now we know - American stupidity
is the result of all those pesky foreign sites feeding
them duff information. Tsk.
RA Fendley was outraged by our Accomplished
Liars song, which compared Bush to Hitler. And just
to prove that Americans are nothing like Nazis,
he sent us this
|
How dare you compare
Bush to Hitler
FUCK YOU and anybody who looks like you !
|
Funnily enough, the Nazis had rather
strong views on appearances too..so no obvious ironies
there then.
And now it is time to mention our
favourite American, Benjamin Schuppel - also known
as Bob the Meek - who wrote to complain about my
comments on liberty. Benjamin begins by saying
|
..I thought you
might enjoy picking apart my argument.
|
Such defeatism hardly seems to strike
the right opening note, but any sign of self-doubt
is an endearing trait in someone from a nation so
deluded by its fantasy of self-importance, and I
am always disposed towards friend Benjamin. However,
our newly struck relationship quickly began to founder
when he started to quote my words in such a way
as to show that he hadn't actually understood what
I said in the first place (no unusual thing, one
admits, for an American).
|
"We pay for
our safety and comfort with whichever
liberties we have to give up in return. When
the cost in [sic] liberty
outweighs the return in security and comfort,
then things have gone
seriously wrong."
|
The quotation is mine, the [sic] is Benjamin's.
Only an American could insert a [sic] which demonstrates,
not an error on the part of the quotee, but
a lack of understanding on the part of the quoter.
Clearly Benjamin thought that I meant the cost of
liberty. After all, that's the usual phrase bandied
around American popular culture (for which read
history) these days. However, the meaning of words
is often more subtle than can be handled by the
average American, and in this case not only was
the word 'in' very deliberate, but also crucial
to the meaning implied. So, for Benjamin's sake,
and for all those Americans who can only get through
this part of the site with subtitles, the cost
of liberty and the cost in liberty are
not the same. The former means paying for liberty
with something else, the latter means paying for
something else with liberty. That most Americans,
like Benjamin, are unable to distinguish between
the two, is the keystone on which George Bush has
built his entire presidency - and it is perhaps
not surprising that our friends across the water
are cheerfully signing away so many of their civil
liberties because that nice man Mr Bush says it
will make 'em safer from that there Al Qaeda Bin
Laden.
Benjamin has written to me on numerous occasions,
and makes no pretence [sic!] about coveting the
Dumb America award,
|
Sir,
I think I have been rude and obnoxious enough
to earn this award.
Have a nice day,
Ben AKA bobthemeek
|
It is true that an award for stupidity would actually
put most Americans a cut above their peers, but
Benjamin is that rarity - a likeable American -
and I have no wish to spoil what could flower into
a beautiful cross-cultural relationship by nominating
him Dumb American. So - close Ben, but no cigar.
Next up is Baff2@AOL, who has either withheld his
name, or is incapable of spelling it. You decide.
|
I couldn't find
out how to word out the link on yours quiz.
andifs were so dumb get the fuck out wre dont
needs you RETARTS!!!
|
Perhaps this is one e-mail which is
best enjoyed without commentary.
Another contender for the award who
has sensibly chosen not to give their name is Ajf828@aol,
who writes in with the old chestnut..
|
You spelled realize
wrong in your "witty" summary at
the end of the quiz. You spelled it realise.
So your credibility is zero. Your anti-American
stance is quite obnoxious. Intelligent Americans
see right through the diatribe and could poke
holes in every one of your "rants"
That must be why you exist on a website where
you can't be challanged.
|
Ajf's imaginative version of the word
'challenged', is more than ironic given the nature
of his or her e-mail. It's unlikely to be a typo,
given the position of the 'a' and 'e' keys, but
I am always eager to give Emaricens the benefit
of the doubt, so I confined myself simply to pointing
out that 'realise', as all regular readers will
know by now, is a British corruption of the original
spelling. Unbowed, Ajf replied...
|
Bravo. I was wondering
if you would pick that up.
|
In true American style, Ajf has managed
to snatch victory from defeat by the cunning tactic
of being defeated, and then claiming it was a victory.
Other notable examples of this include Vietnam,
Iraq... Syria. Oops. Hang on, that's next update.
Talking of ill-advised wars, Joe Kohen
writes
|
Well, as for how
many wars the US started this millennium =
none
|
Which just shows that Fox News makes
Joseph Goebbels look like a beginner. Presumably
Iraq started the war by allowing America to invade
them - just as America started hostilities with
Japan by letting them attack Pearl Harbour. Note
Joe's use of Newspeak here. Most Americans seem
only capable of communicating in shorthand or a
form of unintentional Haiku, but Joe has barely
mastered the human version of Basic. Too bad that
running his e-mail would produce nothing but 'Error
in line 1'.
Sharon Sandora writes in to ask
|
Could you please
post the answers for the participants of the
quiz??
|
Honestly, you couldn't make this stuff up. Can
someone tell her why this would not be a good idea
in a statistical test? And 'WBC' from Houston (for
which one should always make allowances), asserts
|
"Tzar"
isn't really a word, is it - except as a rarely-seen
variant? You should choose between "czar"
and "tsar" if you want to be so
prissily, insolently and tiresomely exact
about everything.
|
Presumably WBC would define checking
the dictionary first as being prissily, insolently
and tiresomely exact about everything.
Anthony R. King wrote a wonderful e-mail of 1,449
words (I counted), and even managed to group some
of them into construable sentences. Anthony R.'s
complaint centred primarily around the fact that
our quiz is not an unbiased and accurate measure
of IQ. And that's not obvious at all. Anthony R.
comes across as the sort of person who blinks a
lot in direct sunlight - and his e-mail meanders
between poorly constructed, laborious attempts at
logical argument, and painfully irrelevant waffle.
However, some of his choicer moments are worth quoting.
|
First
off, I DO know that most of the world (no
matter how intelligent)
doesn't really understand what "IQ"
is. In fact, even most "experts"
on
the topic can only agree to a certain degree
what "intelligence" should
actually be defined as or how it should be
tested. Your site and its
structure take advantage of this fact, and
the fact that most people
aren't going to actually take some time to
try and read through the
documentation.
|
What documentation? We are talking
about an Internet quiz game here. Perhaps American
university departments use big glowing buttons and
sound effects in their academic research programmes,
but for most people this side of the Atlantic, the
name of the website might have been an indication
that the quiz was intended, not as a serious anthropological
enquiry into the nature of human intelligence -
but mainly as a piss-take. Not so obvious for Anthony
R. however, who continues...
|
Your quiz means
nothing. 20 semi-random timed questions do
not
indicate the size of a person's actual body
of knowledge, do not indicate
a persons ability to understand and interact
with the world around them,
and, to be blunt, do not form a valid basis
for "intelligence," unless
your definition of intelligence reads something
along the lines of "has a
large body of knowledge about European art,
Asian wars and politics, and
chemistry." In addition, I did the test
twice, making sure to answer the
questions the same way each time. I scored
a 15 as an American, and was
told I was the equivalent of a school child
elsewhere. I scored a 14 as
some from elsewhere, and was told "well
done." Other questionable aspects
to the quiz: Who is taking your quiz? What
age are they? Why are they
taking it? Or, more to the point, is your
test group truly random, and
what is the validity of the quiz? Hmmm I'm
a dumbfounded American but
not stupid. .. How are you correlating IQ
tests taken around the world?
Differences in language, timing of subject
matter, culture, and what is
considered important or relevant ideas, skills,
and topics from country to
country and from tester to tester would seem
to preclude direct
correlations.
|
Now this had me in stitches. It's
funny enough that someone should react in such a
stereotypically po-faced manner, but Anthony R.
has apparently locked himself away (with the curtains
closed one presumes) to approach the quiz scientifically,
notepad in hand, 'making sure' to answer the questions
exactly the same way, and has made the groundbreaking
discovery that...it gives different feedback to
Americans and non-Americans! One can just imagine
him, like a modern-day Newton or Archimedes, hardly
able to believe what he has only dared to imagine.
He, Anthony R. King, alone has arrived at this sensational
conclusion. Of course, the sad truth in all this
is that the quiz actually has become a phenomenally
accurate indicator of the general level of American
intelligence. Not, admittedly, because it has any
statistical validity, but purely because of the
general response it has produced. Poor Anthony R.,
rather than refuting the thesis, has managed to
clinch it.
Finally, Anthony R. finishes up by
stating,
|
You're rude, sarcastic,
condescending, and arrogant. You must be an
American or close enough to be in the same
category so that would seem, by
your logic, to preclude actually giving you
credit for anything. Or, at
least being very shocked if you said something
that made sense.
|
One feels at this point that Anthony
R. has locked himself into an infinite logical loop,
like a version of Epimenides' paradox. If I am rude,
sarcastic, condescending and arrogant, then I am
like an American, which means my comments should
be assumed to be as ignorant as an American's, which
would mean that those comments would actually become
invalid, meaning that actually I would NOT be like
an American, which would in turn mean that one could
consider my original supposition to be correct..no
wait...umm. Phew. This is what happens when Americans
are allowed to think without trained supervision.
There is only one course open to Anthony R. - revert
to type.
|
Oh. And did I mention
that you make spelling and grammar mistakes?
;-)
|
And there we have it. After all that,
what he really wanted to say was 'you spelled civilization
wrong'. This, incidentally, from a man who has just
written "20 semi-random timed questions.....do
not form the basis for 'intelligence' "
and "I scored a 14 as some from elsewhere".
America must be permanently filled with the sound
of tinkling glass. Ah well, quod erat etc..
Unfortunately for Michael, his is
one of at least fifty or so complaining about the
scientific validity of our quiz, sent in by people
who are incapable of spotting irony. So, while his
may be one of the longest, it is not original enough
to clinch the award. Anthony R. will receive some
consolation from his runners-up prize of a pair
of sunglasses.
However, that's enough of those who
lost. There were hundreds of others who tried to
get their name in print, but there simply isn't
room to mention them all.
So without further ado, the Dumb America
award for this update goes to the 2.8 million members
of the
Presidential Prayer Team.
Before you click this link, make sure
you are not eating. If this site were in any other
country, it would obviously be a spoof, and I assumed
it was at first. But after trawling through it,
I have to say it actually looks genuine. Genuine,
and scary. The kids' section reads like a Hitler
Jugend manifesto. Note the 'Give' link - whether
this is a request or a command is unclear.
The thing is, Americans really believe
in this stuff. 2.8 million of them have signed up
to this website alone. Now don't get me wrong -
I have nothing against people with spiritual beliefs,
and I have every respect for the normal kind of
American small-c christian who understands that
the bible is not to be taken literally, and that
we are not all duty-bound to castrate homos. But
the idea that God is going to give an extra boost
to George Bush because of a litany of special prayers,
concocted by a crazed bunch of Americans who have
been out in the Nevada sun too long - phew. So many
Americans seem to approach religion like they approach
all things - literally, gullibly, and with their
wallets (and mouths) slightly open. As an indication
of just how stupid American Christians can be, note
the warning on the first line www.god.com
which has to spell out
|
God does not have or need a website
|
Gee - d'you think maybe he's on AOL?
Is there something in the water which makes Americans
such easy prey for the kind of con-artist who dons
a sky-blue frock, sets up a phoney church and preaches
hell-fire while his wife Noelene strong-arms the
congregation into donating cash? Never have there
been such rich pickings, for the charlatan and the
con-man, than in the US. They just lap it up.
Special thanks are due to James Ravenscroft for
sending the link to the Presidential Prayer Team.
I have to admit I am dying to know more about their
views, and I've sent off some questions to them
as follows:
|
Hello
I am interested in becoming a member of
the Presidential Prayer Team, but I wanted
to check a few things first.
I believe in the sanctity of all life,
and the salvation of all men through the suffering
of Jesus Christ. For this reason, my pastor
has always told me I should make it a part
of my daily worship to also pray for the soles
of misguided evil-doers like the 9/11 bombers,
Michael Moore and the rest of all those muslims.
Would it be consistent of me to join the Presidential
Prayer Team and to also pray for muslims?
There has been a lot of coverage about
some this torture stuff in Iraq or whatever.
If I pray for an America Troop, and he then
gets convicted of torturing or abusing an
Iraqi prisoner - will it be ok with God that
I prayed for him?
I hope you can set my mind at rest on
this stuff because I really want to get involved.
I already made a donation to the President's
campaign fund, who I think is a Great Man
and really cleaning up God's world and all.
But I wanted to check before getting involved
in The Prayer Team.
Thank you
N Beinzug
Cleveland, Ohio
|
If they reply, be sure you will be the first to
hear it. In the meantime, if God does surf
the net, I'm sure he won't mind me presenting this
Dumb America award jointly to all
2.8 million members of the Presidential Prayer Team
- with a special mention to all those who actually
parted with hard cash. God bless every one of them.
|